Americans simply cannot get enough of football on television.
According to a December 26, 2014 article in USA Today entitled “Bowl Game Attendance on Decline But TV Interest Grows,” author Brent Schrotenboer states, “Although ticket demand is relatively low for lesser bowls, an incredible number of viewers keep watching, even though oahu is the Camellia Bowl in Montgomery, Ala., a casino game that drew just 20,256 fans last week but attracted an average television audience of 1,114,000, according to ESPN.”
Schrotenboer goes on to state, “Only 1 bowl game a year ago drew fewer than 1.2 million viewers on average, according to Nielsen. That’s better than the 1.1 million who watched an opening day baseball game a year ago involving the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox. Nationally broadcast regular season baseball games in 2012 and 2013 averaged about 680,000 viewers.”
Are you able to imagine then your following scenario for the college football bowl season:
ESPN builds its television studio strictly for the objective of hosting college bowl games. The television network already owns and operates 11 bowl games. In this way, it does not have any middleman to manage for these additional events, eliminating needing to negotiate with another facility to host the game. No costs for having to operate a vehicle production trailers or fly technical crews halfway across the country.
Because this facility could be built as a tv studio and not as an outdoor multipurpose arena, ESPN might make attending the bowl game a genuine multimedia experience for the fan, with special effects like lasers. lights and smoke. The network could ensure the bowl experience for the live attendee in addition to the tv viewer to be unlike any other.
But here’s the catch: the ESPN studio might have merely a limited quantity of seats, say 5,000 or less, which would minimize construction costs. The studio would not have to be much bigger than the typical college football program’s practice facility. Just big enough to exhibit to the million plus viewers that there are actually some fans in the stands ดูบอลสด.Thus, there wouldn’t be a single bad seat in the house. You’d rest assured an up-close and personal bowl experience. And due to the intimate atmosphere, the sounds from the fans would reverberate through the entire facility.
Due to the limited method of getting seats, this would force ticket demand (and prices) up. You can forget 60,000- or 80,000-seat facilities which are less than the usual quarter full. It would be a 180-degree change from the existing experience, where many schools have to depend on daily deal sites to help unload their share of allocated tickets.
Thus, the universities would benefit because they wouldn’t be required to choose the 1000s of tickets that they cannot sell (even on Groupon).
ESPN could use this facility multiple times during the expanse of the two- to three-week bowl period.
For example, this season five additional college football teams qualified for a dish that they were not invited to. That’s two additional games that the schools and network are not generating an incredible number of dollars from, forcing television viewers to instead watch sitcom reruns when they’d much rather be enjoying a live sporting event. And advertisers prefer to be buying time on a tv program that most viewers will watch live and can’t fast-forward through their commercials.
Schrotenboer states, “Schools, coaches and players also want it – planning to a dish game means more possible donations, more television exposure, more practice time and more bonus money.”