Arguments to manage Online Poker

Recently, in 2006, the United States enacted legislation, known as the UIGEA (Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act), which essentially made it unlawful for almost any American Poker player to fund an on line Poker site with money to be found in Poker gambling. There are many reasons as to why this detrimental law ought to be reversed, and why the U.S. government should consider regulating Online Poker. Here certainly are a few central ideas:

The UIGEA was literally tacked on as an eleventh hour rider to a Ports bill, which was destined to pass. The UIGEA was added to ths bill, which was signed by President Bush, about 20 minutes prior to the Port bills Congress vote. The UIGEA was never discussed or debated in Congress, and was voted on from its original draft, which includes many, many holes in it.

The UIGEA unfairly puts the onus on its implementation on the U.S. Banking system. It makes banks responsible and culpable for identifying and stopping Dewapoker checks and internet bank transfers that are gambling-related. Specifically, the UIGEA does not clearly delineate just what a gambling transaction is and isn’t. The banking system is ill-equipped with the required man-power to implement this kind of vague law, and has been blunt in stating that it would take many years to implement a correct system that may identify offending transactions, without inadvertently halting benign transactions. Further, the UIGEA is requiring the banking system to implement this law by itself time (i.e., for no payment), and assume the culpability of its actions. Given the recent turmoil in the U.S. banking system, it makes zero sense for the banking industry to be spending its time devising an idea to implement a law that is packed with crevices, specially when you can find infinitely more pressing needs that the banking system must reckon with your days.

Now, for the hypocrisy argument – the U.S. government says that online Poker is illegal, when accounts are funded for the purposes of gambling, but it’s totally legal and permissible to play state lotteries, wager for online horse-racing, and bet on fantasy sports online. Why on earth are lotteries deemed to be legal (when, in reality, they are totally left to chance), when a game of skill (Poker) is deemed to be illegal and immoral, as previously mentioned by the proponents of the UIGEA. It just makes no sense. Anyone who plays Poker knows that there surely is an inherent chance element related to the overall game, however it is essentially a casino game of skill (akin to Chess).

We are still running the largest government deficit in American history, courtesy the Bush Administration, and the National Debt could have increased from 5 BB to 9.5 BB under George Bush’s watch (that over a 90 % increase). Regulation of online Poker could bring a significant windfall to the U.S. government, that will certainly have a positive impact on lowering the budget deficit and reducing the ballooning National debt. There are many who have suggested just how to implement taxing online Poker, and we’re able to surely study from our friends in the U.K., who’re already doing this.

There are many (this author included) who genuinely believe that the reason the U.S. government is not regulating internet-based Poker, may be the strong Las Vegas casino lobbyists (who believe online Poker is hurting their business), and those that genuinely believe that Las Vegas is planning their strategy of going online sooner or later as well. The lawmakers who engineered UIGEA genuinely believe that elimination of non-US-based online Poker, can help pave the way for land-based casinos to enter this market, and can help eradicate any international competition that may otherwise exist.

Other proponents of the UIGEA argue that online Poker encourages underage gambling, which destroys the fabric of American society. Nothing might be further from the reality, and the sophistication of technology currently exists that will enable online Poker websites to prohibit the patronage of underage customers.

Finally, how could it be that the American government can tell its U.S. citizens how they can spend their very own money ? There is a serious Freedom of Speech issue at stake here. Further, the net shows no geographical boundaries, and by prohibiting citizens from playing on an on line Poker site that is physically positioned in another country, this demonstrates that the U.S. government feels no remorse in telling its constituency what websites it could and cannot frequent. If the U.S. government is not going to allow online Poker sites from being accesses, then maybe, just maybe, we ought to eliminate any websites that cater to alcohol, tobacco, sex, bank cards, etc., etc., etc. Why stop at online Poker ?

In summary, there are numerous, many reasons to repeal the UIGEA, and permit online Poker to be played. Hopefully, the next governmental regime might find the light, and reverse the stupidity and short-sightedness imposed by the current administration.

Douglas Hayman, President of Expert Software Systems, is a database designer and developer, that designs and hosts several informational websites, including:

Leave a reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>